Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:52

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is the Chinese economy currently collapsing? If not, what could potentially cause it to collapse?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Adam Silver Talks NBA Expansion - Blazer's Edge
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do philosophy of physics when you can do physics itself? - Aeon
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All-time great wrestler Hakuho quits Japan Sumo Association with plans to form global body - AP News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Men more likely than women to orgasm from anal penetration, study finds - PsyPost
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
F1 in Spain: Now that was a lapse in judgment - Ars Technica
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Cardi B’s Video Sparks New Album Announcement Talk Online - Yahoo